Summary of accepted Fedora 21 Changes - weeks 13/14

Kay Sievers kay at vrfy.org
Thu Apr 24 04:48:46 UTC 2014


On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Petr Pisar <ppisar at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 2014-04-07, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung at 0pointer.de> wrote:
>> On Mon, 07.04.14 15:00, Jaroslav Reznik (jreznik at redhat.com) wrote:
>>> * PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For Long-Running Services
>>>   URL:
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PrivateDevicesAndPrivateNetwork
>>>   Announcement: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-March/197175.html
>>>
> [...]
>> To answer this: the kernel network namespace thing PrivateNetwork= is
>> built on disconnects all address families at once. There's no choice to
>> only disassociate some address families, either all or none. (except for
>> the weirdness of AF_UNIX sockets in the fs namespace which stay
>> connectable as long as the fs is reachable, see feature page).
>>
> What about D-Bus? D-Bus uses AF_UNIX currently. But as you can know,
> there is an aim to move D-Bus to a new protocol family. Is it possible that
> all the daemons with a D-Bus control interface will stop work then?

If you mean kdbus, it is not related to network, it is based on
character devices.

Kay


More information about the devel mailing list