Copr and Playground plugin part of dnf-plugins-core?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:29:15 +0200
Miroslav Suchý <msuchy at redhat.com> wrote:

> In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090516
> Jiri asked for removing Copr (and Playground) DNF plugin out of
> dnf-plugins-core.
> 
> Since this is not technical but merely political question I would
> like to ask wider audience: Put your voice here please:
>     http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=5358d77de4b06a67c5b08e05
> If there will be significant votes for one option, I would do what
> most of you wish. Otherwise I will forward it to Fesco for decision.

I'm not sure a open vote is the way to go here. How about we try and
figure this out on technical grounds?

Personally I think it's fine to be in dnf-plugins-core, but the
maintainers of dnf don't think so I guess, but that could just be that
the audience isn't clear for the playground repo yet. 

It seems like something the env-and-stacks group could look into? 
ie, decide what the audience is for the playground repo. 

Is this intended only for advanced users/developers? Then, I suppose it
could be a seperate package that they would have to know to install. 

If it's intended for general users if they know to look/enable it, then
it needs to be at least installed by default. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140424/0ce0ee80/attachment.sig>