Deprecate setjmp/longjmp? [was Re: Maybe it's time to get rid of tcpwrappers/tcpd?]

[Casey Dahlin]

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 08:57:27AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-04-27 at 23:02 +0100, Andrew Price wrote:
> > On 24/04/14 15:13, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > We probably should make setjmp()-freeness a requirement for
> > > all code included in Fedora.
> > 
> > Would it be worth the effort, and how feasible is it anyway?
> 
> I don't think it'd be worth the effort, and I think the burden of
> computing feasibility should rest with those who think it _is_ worth the
> effort.
> 

Well, we could consider banning it from new packages and just let attrition
take care of the rest.

--CJD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140428/0b8d9365/attachment.sig>