"Tick-tock" release cadence?
mattdm at fedoraproject.org
Sun Dec 7 05:30:15 UTC 2014
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 04:59:54AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > That is not part of the "tick-tock" proposal.
> > That is part of the "polish" release proposal.
> I don't care how you call it. The fact remains that doing a release without
> taking in new upstream releases is a complete no-go from the standpoint of
> desktop environment maintainers. It also goes against the Fedora "First"
> principle, as already stated by others.
Well, it kind of matters, if you're going to throw around lines like
"this 'tick-tock' proposal is a complete no-go" when you actually are
talking about something I went out of my way to explain was _different_
from the tick-tock idea.
<mattdm at fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
More information about the devel