F22 System Wide Change: Elasticsearch

Aleksandar Kurtakov akurtako at redhat.com
Wed Dec 17 14:39:50 UTC 2014


Not a bundling but creating a compat packages for older version where needed. Nothing stops people from creating them now.

Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Josh Boyer" <jwboyer at fedoraproject.org>
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 4:25:35 PM
> Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Elasticsearch
> 
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik at redhat.com> wrote:
> > = Proposed System Wide Change: Elasticsearch =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Elasticsearch
> >
> > Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek <jvanek at rehat.com>
> >
> > Goal of this change is to pack Elasticsearch into main Fedora repo.
> >
> > == Detailed Description ==
> > The Elasticsearch [1] is fully-featured self-standing opensource [2]
> > indexing
> > server. Many people and many tools do use it. And many people do want it in
> > Fedora. Aim of this Change is to make elastic search available by simple
> > yum
> > install elasticsearch, and of course enable it as dependence. To build a
> > custom indexing tool on top of elastic search is more easy than current
> > upstream install and download.
> >
> > == Scope ==
> > * Proposal owners:
> > ** pack Elasticsearch - nearly done - see RHBZ#902086
> > ** make it somehow works
> > ** verify it works
> > ** tune list of crucial dependencies
> > ** enable Elasticsearch as service - something what have to be decided
> >
> > * Other developers:
> > ** '''This is crucial part of this proposal'''
> > ** Elastic search is extremely tuned application, and like it, its
> > dependencies must be strictly kept in correct versions
> > ** Currently known troublemakers:
> > *** lucene
> > *** netty3
> > *** sigar
> > *** compress-lzf
> > *** guava (currently needed 18, avaiable 17)
> 
> So from what I can tell, the dependency issues are the only thing that
> is preventing this from being a self-contained Change.  Is that
> correct?
> 
> If so, perhaps pursuing a bundling exception would be a more
> straightforward approach.
> 
> josh
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct


More information about the devel mailing list