AppData Screenshot Requirements
hughsient at gmail.com
Thu Dec 18 09:54:23 UTC 2014
On 18 December 2014 at 09:46, Bastien Nocera <bnocera at redhat.com> wrote:
> To be honest, the "slowly evolving" AppData requirements/changes have
> also grated me the wrong way.
Okay, so that's probably something we need to do something about.
Would more frequent blogging help or hinder this?
> I get confused by the upstream vs. Fedora requirements,
They are the same thing, no?
> I get confused by the F21 vs. F22 requirements.
So, at the moment the only way that F22 and F21 differ is that F22
requires a minimum icon size of 48px, and f21 requires 32px. Most
actively maintained packages (especially the kind of ones you
maintain) easily meet this requirement. Would a generated HTML page
pkgname,fasname,application-id,green/red for F21, green/red for F22?
be a useful thing to do?
> I get annoyed that I can't easily test changes and see what it will look like
Doesn't dumping the updated AppData file in /usr/share/appdata work?
More information about the devel