chromium

[Christopher]

The fact that there isn't a popular 3rd-party repo packaging Chromium does
not appear to be relevant to Fedora. I don't see anybody discouraging it.
Perhaps you should approach a popular 3rd-party to suggestion packaging
Chromium in their repos?

http://rpmfusion.org/ is one such standard 3rd-party repo for Fedora users.
Perhaps you can contribute packaging for Chromium to their project?


--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:33 AM, john.tiger <john.tigernassau at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I understand Fedora's position on Chromium BUT not having a 3rd party
> available for F21 is not acceptable -
>
> ie. this morning Firefox is not connecting to the internet (yet
> thunderbird, dnf, etc is ...  - I'm seeing a kernel problem warning
> WARNING: CPU 0 PID 1419 at drivers.net.wireless/ath/ath9k.recv
>
> point is, browser choice is important and Chromium on my F20 is working.
>
> Also as developers, we need to work with all browsers.
>
> Even if Fedora does not elect to maintain packages for Chromium, there
> should be some effort to work with or encourage a 3rd party or fix whatever
> package might be holding up someone else from implementing it (ie if it's
> clang compiling or whatever.
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20141220/ef3979a8/attachment.html>