chromium

[Antonio Trande]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/20/2014 05:33 PM, john.tiger wrote:
> I understand Fedora's position on Chromium BUT not having a 3rd
> party available for F21 is not acceptable -
> 
> ie. this morning Firefox is not connecting to the internet (yet 
> thunderbird, dnf, etc is ...  - I'm seeing a kernel problem
> warning WARNING: CPU 0 PID 1419 at
> drivers.net.wireless/ath/ath9k.recv
> 
> point is, browser choice is important and Chromium on my F20 is
> working.
> 
> Also as developers, we need to work with all browsers.
> 
> Even if Fedora does not elect to maintain packages for Chromium,
> there should be some effort to work with or encourage a 3rd party
> or fix whatever package might be holding up someone else from
> implementing it (ie if it's clang compiling or whatever.

I dont understand.
What has to do the browser with a wireless driver problem?

- -- 
Antonio Trande

mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x66E15D00
Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=FooU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----