5tFTW: Fedora 21, 22, and 19, firewall discussion, and holiday break

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 17:51 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Maybe I put it too simple, but instead of opening all high ports by 
> default what about having firewall rules declared in RPMs for
> packages 
> that need to have ports opened?

Because we need to support applications that use random ports.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20141220/5c250f4d/attachment.sig>