Auto-expiring bugs are getting absurd

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 22:57 +0000, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 05/02/14 22:50, Adam Williamson wrote:
> 
> > The problem is that no-one seems to come up with an alternative that's
> > any better. Leaving bugs on EOL versions open to rot away and be ignored
> > is no use. We *could* give everyone privs to re-open closed bugs, I
> > guess, and I personally don't think that would end terribly, but it's
> > kind of a radical plan.
> 
> What about allowing the reporter to update the version and/or reopen it 
> if it does get closed? or is BZ not able to offer that as an option?

The reporter already can. The problem comes when the reporter goes
inactive, but someone else knows the bug is still valid, and that person
doesn't have editbugs.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net