Educating packagers about always making changes in devel / rawhide first

[Josh Boyer]

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
> Am 12.02.2014 20:46, schrieb Josh Boyer:
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 12.02.2014 20:26, schrieb Peter Oliver:
>>>> On 10 February 2014 16:42, Till Maas <opensource at till.name> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Isn't AutoQA already running these kind of checks?
>>>>
>>>> Here's an example:
>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-1847/AtomicParsley-0.9.5-2.fc20
>>>
>>> worthless as long "results are informative only"
>>> it only will get effective if the build is purged until it passes
>>
>> That is untrue.  I've pulled builds myself when I notice this fails.
>> Please don't generalize like that.  It's effective and useful for
>> maintainers that pay attention
>
> stats would be interesting how many pay attention in case
> they not get hurted noticeable
>
> many maintainers do not pay attention if it does not hurt

This is likely true, but that doesn't mean AutoQA is worthless.  It
means there are maintainers that need to improve.

josh