Proposal to WGs and rel-eng: Move 90-default.preset from systemd to fedora-release

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:53:13 +0100
> Václav Pavlín <vpavlin at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> 
> ...snip...
> 
> > Based on these arguments, I'd like to propose to move this file to
> > the fedora-release package (or elsewhere, if you can suggest better
> > place). This package is specific to Fedora distribution as well and
> > contains Fedora specific configuration files (i.e. Fedora repo
> > files). The question of moving the file somewhere else than systemd
> > might be really interesting for working groups either. It defines
> > which services should be enabled by default after installation, which
> > might differ for different products. (Or not, has anybody thought
> > about this yet?) An example off top of my head - we would like to
> > have sshd enabled after installation by default on server, but
> > disabled on workstation.
> > 
> > I would like to ask release engineering for any feedback and 
> > representatives of working groups to discuss this on their meetings.
>From systemd side, this seems like a right move. Coupling the presets
to systemd package means that they are often unnecessarily delayed.
Wherever they are moved, I think it is important that package has
plenty of maintainers who can do small updates as necessary.

Zbyszek