exclude people from giving karma?

[Christopher Meng]

On 2/24/14, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> Christopher, Harald's going overboard with his emphasis as usual, but he
> is correct that you should take extra care when giving karma if you
> don't get the update from the updates-testing repository. In future,
> please do be careful to check if the updates are internally dependency
> consistent before giving karma.
>
> It is incorrect to split an update from another update on which it
> depends, as happened in this case. As LO requires libcmis, they should
> be bundled together. If you knew LO required the updated libcmis, it
> wasn't correct to up-karma the LO update when it did not include the
> updated libcmis.

Will do.

Actually last weekend I saw the libreoffice update and tested it with
dep from koji by hand, I thought that the maintainer would push
libcmis as update so I just left the kerma for libreoffice here. I
think he also should submit them in one update next time.