packages from bitbucket

[Tim Lauridsen]

Seems like bitbucket uses unversioned tar ball, not the best approch

https://bitbucket.org/yarosla/httpress/get/tip.tar.gz

I would make my own tarball from the git checkout and document in the
spec how to make it

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control


Tim



On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
<nmav at redhat.com>wrote:

> Hello,
>  I've submitted a while ago a review-request on a package [0] that is
> taken from bitbucket.org. Unfortunately there was no reviewer yet, and I
> suspect that is because unlike github [1] we have no rules on how to
> handle bitbucket. Have other packagers experienced something similar in
> other software? Is there a "good" way to handle repository-distributed
> software? As it is now in [0] I've tried to simulate the github rules on
> bitbucket.
>
> regards,
> Nikos
>
>
> [0]. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282
> [1]. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github
>
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140226/e3145c2c/attachment.html>