packages from bitbucket

[Sandro Mani]

On 26.02.2014 10:16, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> Hello,
>   I've submitted a while ago a review-request on a package [0] that is
> taken from bitbucket.org. Unfortunately there was no reviewer yet, and I
> suspect that is because unlike github [1] we have no rules on how to
> handle bitbucket. Have other packagers experienced something similar in
> other software? Is there a "good" way to handle repository-distributed
> software? As it is now in [0] I've tried to simulate the github rules on
> bitbucket.
>
> regards,
> Nikos
>
>
> [0]. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282
> [1]. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github
>
>
FWIW, this is how eigen does it:

# Source file is at: http://bitbucket.org/eigen/eigen/get/3.1.3.tar.bz2
# Renamed source file so it's not just a version number
Source0:        eigen-%{version}.tar.bz2


Sandro