Packages with missing %check
Adam Williamson
awilliam at redhat.com
Thu Feb 27 08:12:59 UTC 2014
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 08:09 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 06:50:56PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 21:53 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > It happens too often in
> > > Rawhide, and a simple test (in %check or elsewhere) could fix it.
> >
> > You can't really test a system boot in a package's %check. That's very
> > definitely not what it's for.
>
> It turns out you can. Read the link I posted:
>
> http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/qemu-sanity-check/
I've read it. I'm not exactly convinced.
> Yes, it doesn't catch every possible problem, but the kernel is
> sometimes pushed out with major problems that could be caught with
> simple testing.
IIRC you had one example for this, and the bug turned out to be racy and
hardware-dependent, which is why the kernel devs didn't see it in the
tests they *do* actually do.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
More information about the devel
mailing list