dnf versus yum
awilliam at redhat.com
Sun Jan 5 18:04:13 UTC 2014
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 10:27 +0100, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
> On 01/05/2014 09:23 AM, Mattia Verga wrote:
> > They really want to make dnf work this way.
> > This is explained here:
> > http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html#dnf-erase-kernel-deletes-all-packages-called-kernel
> Yes, I have read that, but (strongly) disagree.
> The running kernel should not be removed with a simple 'dnf erase
> kernel' (why did they change remove into erase?),
They didn't. Both work on both.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
More information about the devel