enlightenment 0.18.1 etc...

[Bob Richmond]

I uploaded a new version of the efl srpm that patches configure directly 
to look for the correct tslib pkg-config and removes the call to 
autogen. Also corrects a cut & paste error I made that erroneously 
included libemotion in the ephysics package.

http://www.lorez.org/enlightenment/efl-1.8.3-1.fc20.src.rpm

On 01/05/2014 09:01 AM, Bob Richmond wrote:

> The autogen thing was because I patched configure.ac to look for the
> pkg-config name for tslib as tslib-0.0 (as shipped in Fedora). Which
> means configure needed to be regenerated. I guess an alternative would
> be to patch configure directly, but eh... :)
>
> On 01/05/2014 04:02 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Dan Mashal <dan.mashal at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Bob Richmond <bob at lorez.org> wrote:
>>>> No, the EFL is distributed as one big tarball now. All the old releases
>>>> could be found here:
>>>>
>>>> http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/
>>>>
>>>> Starting with 1.8.0, they're distributed in:
>>>>
>>>> http://download.enlightenment.org/rel/libs/efl/
>>>>
>>>> ... as a single tarball. The spec file in my efl source RPM creates
>>>> individual subpackages that resemble the existing efl packages out of a
>>>> single source RPM.
>>>>
>>>
>>> HI,
>>>
>>> Yes, I've been working on packaging up the new efl and submitting it
>>> for a review. If you would like to help maintain it you are more than
>>> welcome to.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Obviously fully didn't read the original post. Just wanted to say
>> thanks for this. Majorly reduces the time I have to spend on this.
>>
>> I'll go through these and submit them for review ASAP. Also, thanks
>> for the patches.
>>
>> Just an FYI, autogen.sh doesn't need to be run on these packages as
>> they already include a configure script. However, in tarballs that
>> don't contain a configure script and just autogen.sh, you usually
>> would want to run "NOCONFIGURE=1 ./autogen.sh".
>>
>> Thanks again.
>>
>> Dan