dnf versus yum
vondruch at redhat.com
Mon Jan 6 13:06:48 UTC 2014
Dne 6.1.2014 13:31, Lars E. Pettersson napsal(a):
> On 01/06/2014 12:43 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Otherwise, I totally agree with Chris and with DNF upstream. "dnf remove
>> kernel" should remove every kernel and should not behave magically.
> What would be the point in removing the running kernel? Is there
> actually such a use case?
Why are you asking? May be you should let your imagination run riot.
I don't even remember I ever needed "yum remove kernel". Does it mean
that "yum remove kernel" should not work at all no matter if it leaves
running kernel on the system or not? Or should it be completely
prohibited? Why we keep 3 versions of kernel on the system anyway?
Also, I'd like to point out that "yum/dnf remove" by default shows what
it is going to do and you have to explicitly confirm the action, isn't
it enough? How much protection do you need?
More information about the devel