Matthias Clasen mclasen at redhat.com
Mon Jan 6 17:36:08 UTC 2014

On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 18:06 +0100, VĂ­t Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 6.1.2014 17:53, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:36:09AM -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
> >> One of the primary reasons for replacing AutoQA with taskotron is to
> >> make it easier for folks to contribute checks. AutoQA's implementation
> >> just isn't capable of doing that in a reasonable fashion. We haven't
> >> gotten into the specifics of how package-specific checks would work
> >> yet, but one idea was to keep them in the package's git repo.
> > What about including them in the RPMs themselves, in a new section similar
> > to the existing %check -- or just in a standard file location (so no changes
> > to RPM itself are needed immediately)?
> >
> Not sure how RPM fits here. For example, Ruby on Rails framework consist 
> of 8 basic packages and I'd like to be able to do some basic integration 
> test if any of this packages is rebuilt. This is totally independent of 

We are still very interested in having installed tests for the GNOME
stack run in the Fedora context. See here:
These tests also assume that they are running in a session on an
installed system, not at build time in a build system.

More information about the devel mailing list