Taskotron (was: Re: Unannounced ABI change without soname bump in libevdev-0.6 in Rawhide (and F19 and F20...) breaks GNOME, probably other consumers)

Rahul Sundaram metherid at gmail.com
Wed Jan 8 07:14:43 UTC 2014


On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:

> Well, we'll want to do all sorts of tests that aren't obviously tied to
> any specific package. The only kinds of tests it would make sense to
> have in packages would be tests that are very tightly associated with
> that package, but then we have a whole bunch of other tests stored
> somewhere else, and why not just keep the package-specific tests there
> too?

Well the advantage of keeping the package specific tests along with the
package is that it provides more visible and is more readily accessible
compared to tests that is stored somewhere else.  If the expectation is
that QA is going to maintain them, former is fine but if you want package
maintainers to be involved, then a tight association between the specs etc
and tests would be a good thing

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140108/1c89d22d/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the devel mailing list