libev - bundling - "expected"

Tim St Clair tstclair at redhat.com
Wed Jan 8 19:58:47 UTC 2014


Thanks Adam, that was the reference I was looking for. 

Cheers,
Tim

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adam Williamson" <awilliam at redhat.com>
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 1:39:41 PM
> Subject: Re: libev - bundling - "expected"
> 
> On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 13:09 -0500, Tim St Clair wrote:
> > Greetings folks -
> > 
> > It appears that I've run into a conundrum: libev upstream developer(s)
> > actually encourage (re)bundling of libev, see -
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049554
> > 
> > I was wondering if there was president for how to handle *this.  In
> > groking the code, it's not run-time configurable, but alas it's a
> > dependency on one of my packages.
> 
> The bundling policy has an exception for 'copylibs', which *may* apply
> here:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Copylibs
> 
> this is the clause you would need to check to see if your case matches
> it.
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
> 
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

-- 
Cheers,
Tim


More information about the devel mailing list