libev - bundling - "expected"
Tim St Clair
tstclair at redhat.com
Wed Jan 8 19:58:47 UTC 2014
Thanks Adam, that was the reference I was looking for.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adam Williamson" <awilliam at redhat.com>
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 1:39:41 PM
> Subject: Re: libev - bundling - "expected"
> On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 13:09 -0500, Tim St Clair wrote:
> > Greetings folks -
> > It appears that I've run into a conundrum: libev upstream developer(s)
> > actually encourage (re)bundling of libev, see -
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049554
> > I was wondering if there was president for how to handle *this. In
> > groking the code, it's not run-time configurable, but alas it's a
> > dependency on one of my packages.
> The bundling policy has an exception for 'copylibs', which *may* apply
> this is the clause you would need to check to see if your case matches
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
More information about the devel