pacemaker in Fedora and RHEL

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Wed Jan 8 22:47:31 UTC 2014


On 12 Dec 2013, at 2:40 pm, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote:

> On 11/12/13 06:36, Christopher Meng wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I wonder if there are some reasonable explanations of package
>> "pacemaker" in the repo.
>> 
>> I checked the package and the result returned is:
>> 
>> Fedora: pacemaker-1.1.9-3.fc20 in rawhide.
>> 
>> RHEL: pacemaker-1.1.10-14.el6.
>> 
>> The latest version is 1.1.11RC1(1.1.10 Final stable).
>> 
>> Why is the package in Fedora behind the one in RHEL in spite of the
>> maintainer of these two are the same people?
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> --
>> 
>> Yours sincerely,
>> Christopher Meng
> 
> Hi Christopher,
> 
>  I can't speak authoritatively, but I am willing to bet it's a couple
> of things. There was a huge push to get 1.1.10 ready for rhel 6.5, there
> has been a lot of work on 1.1.11 and Andrew's wife just gave birth, so
> he's on vacation for a bit. I would guess that pacemaker on fedora just
> didn't get to the front of the burner yet.

At the point it got to the front burner there were some known problems with 1.1.10 that I didn't want to push into fedora.
As soon as .11 is released (any day now), I'll be pushing it into Fedora.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140109/e0db6f1e/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list