dnf versus yum

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Thu Jan 9 14:56:50 UTC 2014


On Jan 7, 2014 4:53 AM, "Frank Murphy" <frankly3d at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:28:59 +0100
> Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>
> > look like it starts to happen again: a replacement which is not ready
> >
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049310
>
> It seems the majority want the current dnf default [1] to be kept
> Those who want to keep "running" kernel may need to speak up [2]
>
> [1]
>
http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html#dnf-erase-kernel-deletes-all-packages-called-kernel
>
> [2]
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049310

After asking on the bugzilla it seems that ales would like people who want
this change to cc themselves on the bug report.  If the cc reaches 40 he'll
reconsider.  Kinda a strange way of deciding but whatever works for the
maintainer I guess.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140109/34feda1e/attachment.html>


More information about the devel mailing list