dnf versus yum

Jiri Moskovcak jmoskovc at redhat.com
Thu Jan 9 15:03:06 UTC 2014


On 01/09/2014 03:56 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> On Jan 7, 2014 4:53 AM, "Frank Murphy" <frankly3d at gmail.com
> <mailto:frankly3d at gmail.com>> wrote:
>  >
>  > On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:28:59 +0100
>  > Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net
> <mailto:h.reindl at thelounge.net>> wrote:
>  >
>  > > look like it starts to happen again: a replacement which is not ready
>  > >
>  > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049310
>  >
>  > It seems the majority want the current dnf default [1] to be kept
>  > Those who want to keep "running" kernel may need to speak up [2]
>  >
>  > [1]
>  >
> http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html#dnf-erase-kernel-deletes-all-packages-called-kernel
>  >
>  > [2]
>  > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049310
>
> After asking on the bugzilla it seems that ales would like people who
> want this change to cc themselves on the bug report.  If the cc reaches
> 40 he'll reconsider.  Kinda a strange way of deciding but whatever works
> for the maintainer I guess.
>

And what would be the right way to decide? And please stay assured that 
this is not a trolling, I would really like to see some agreement in 
Fedora on how to decide these kind of things.

Thanks,
Jirka

> -Toshio
>
>
>



More information about the devel mailing list