dnf versus yum

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Thu Jan 9 15:40:34 UTC 2014

Am 09.01.2014 16:37, schrieb Jiri Moskovcak:
> On 01/09/2014 04:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 09.01.2014 16:03, schrieb Jiri Moskovcak:
>>>>   > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049310
>>>> After asking on the bugzilla it seems that ales would like people who
>>>> want this change to cc themselves on the bug report.  If the cc reaches
>>>> 40 he'll reconsider.  Kinda a strange way of deciding but whatever works
>>>> for the maintainer I guess.
>>> And what would be the right way to decide? And please stay assured that this is not a trolling,
>>> I would really like to see some agreement in Fedora on how to decide these kind of things.
>> in doubt in case of rewrites support the existing features and start
>> the clean codebase with them in mind
> And that is official Fedora (I mean respected by the community) rule or yours?

mine - there is no "official" one and hardly will ever be

that is what a user normally expects: optimize things, add new features but do
not demand him to change his workflow with no for the user obvious improvement

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 246 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140109/d531547d/attachment.sig>

More information about the devel mailing list