Sub-package dropped upstream
leamas.alec at gmail.com
Thu Jan 9 21:20:10 UTC 2014
Yes, still it's an interesting issue... perhaps one count how many which
actually are installed, but many problems also here: users privacy/opt-in,
easily spoofed, infrastructure.
In any case it would be great to have some estimate on this.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 12:08:49 -0800, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I maintain the uwsgi package for fedora, which optionally builds a bunch
> > of modules to integrate with several other languages. One of the plugins
> > got recently removed upstream but it hasn't got any replacements yet (see
> > the top of http://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/Erlang.html)
> > Currently f19 and f20 have 1.9.19 available, and I would like to update
> > to 1.9.21 but that would mean I have to deprecate the existing package
> > uwsgi-plugin-erlang. Is this the correct approach? adding an obsoletes
> > tag in the spec for uwsgi-plugin-erlang < 1.9.20 ?
> That would be the only way to withdraw the package from users'
> installations, especially if not obsoleting it would result in broken
> Depending on how popular the package might be, such breakage could
> annoy users.
> > Tangential question, do we have statistics of how many times this (or
> > any other) package has been downloaded?
> Hardly feasible, given that every mirror server would need to count
> downloads and submit the results to the Fedora Project, and then one could
> still not conclude safely whether a package has been installed actually
> and is still in use (or has been downloaded/mirrored only).
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel