dnf-0.4.11

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Sun Jan 12 23:39:53 UTC 2014



Am 13.01.2014 00:17, schrieb Orcan Ogetbil:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
>> Well, IMHO the docs are actually quite clear on that 'all' refers to all
>> metadata rather than all repositories.
>>
>> That said, perhaps enough people has been confused by this to make some kind
>> of improvement motivated.
>>
> 
> I am pretty sure if you flip the current behavior and make 'clean all'
> act on disabled repos, some other subset of users (e.g. me) will be
> confused

please explain how you would be confused

"clean all" would only delete metadata which are anyways refreshed
at the next call with whatever repo enabled and "clean all" is there
to make sure that *all* metadata is refreshed instead use maybe outdated

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 246 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140113/6131b17c/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list