llvm 3.4 in rawhide time

John5342 john5342 at gmail.com
Tue Jan 14 14:43:48 UTC 2014


On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:54 PM, David Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> >
> >
> > On 14 Jan 2014 06:04, "David Airlie" < airlied at redhat.com > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've gotten a build tag f21-llvm for attempting to rebase rawhide to
> llvm
> > > 3.4
> >
> > Assuming there aren't any major stumbling blocks, are there any plans to
> back
> > port llvm 3.4 to f20 (like was done for llvm 3.3 in f19)?
> >
> > I need clang 3.4 for my day job but have been holding off on a parallel
> > installable version until I know what's happening in Fedora proper.
>
> Maybe, we might like it for GPU drivers, but I want to see how hairy it is,
> so far it looks rather hairy, most of the projects failed on my simple
> just rebuild it.


iirc last time the rebase was required in order to get a later Mesa into
the distro. I will hold off for a few days to see just how hairy things
are. If you decide not to rebase f20 i will build something privately, or
even a copr build if anybody else is interested in it.

If you need any help with testing, patches, etc i would be happy to help
where i can.

-- 
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary and
those who don't...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140114/8b50f088/attachment.html>


More information about the devel mailing list