EPEL 7 question
Adam Williamson
awilliam at redhat.com
Thu Jan 16 20:14:52 UTC 2014
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:10 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 07:38 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Richard Shaw
> <hobbes1069 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I noticed that EPEL 7 branches were created for several of
> my packages that
> > > have el6 branches, but not all of them. I didn't request
> them (yet) so I'm
> > > wondering, are some packages automatically added or did
> someone else request
> > > them as a dependency to one of their packages? I need to
> dig through my
> > > packages but I intend to maintain el7 branches of all of
> my packages that
> > > have el6 branches.
> >
> > It's possible that these were some of the packages that you
> and I
> > share as dependencies of MythTV. I requested branches for a
> lot of my
> > packages on January 11th using Dennis' procedure with the
> wiki [1],
> > but I haven't gotten around to doing the builds in Koji yet.
> I'm
> > planning to do the builds by next week.
>
>
> I would've expected anything that exists in epel6 and doesn't
> exist in
> rhel7 to get an epel7 branch. It seems a bit ludicrous doing
> it manually
> - do I have to go through all the deps of any package I want
> to build
> for epel7 and figure this out manually and file branch
> requests for each
> package that isn't in rhel7? yeesh.
>
> Agreed... The only argument I can think of against it is that we don't
> want stuff that's not being maintained from automatically making it's
> way into el7
Well, things don't get *built* just because they have a git branch. I
don't think we usually do mass builds in epel, do we?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
More information about the devel
mailing list