Adam Williamson wrote:
> So, in the discussion of this, the following was presented as an
> obstacle:
>
> 18:31:13 <notting> Requires: foo > 1.0-1.%{release}
> 18:31:22 <notting> 1.0-1.fc20.copr *satisfies* that
Oh joy, ye olde repotag debate is back!
Kevin Kofler