directfb, fusionsound packaged, review for submition and sdl2 bridge

Ilyes Gouta ilyes.gouta at gmail.com
Sun Jan 19 12:43:43 UTC 2014


Hi,

On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta at iki.fi> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Juan Manuel Borges Caño
> <juanmabcmail at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The packages built okay without the optional kernel module (to know,
> > linux-fusion is the one), if that turns to be obligatory, again, i'd take
> > alsa packaging as a cool example :)
>
> ALSA kernel modules are included in the upstream kernel, AFAIK
> DirectFB ones are not. In order to be included in Fedora, they need to
> be upstream or Fedora kernel maintainers convinced to ship them within
> the kernel package.
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:KernelModules


It should be possible to build DirectFB-multi without the linux-fusion
kernel module, so that's reverting to shmem and UNIX sockets for IPC. I
remember I saw fixes for Fusion userspace posted against the -1.7 branch.

Ilyes


>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140119/1721e965/attachment.html>


More information about the devel mailing list