SELinux RPM scriplet issue annoucement
drago01 at gmail.com
Sun Jan 19 18:45:33 UTC 2014
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 19:15:35 +0100, drago01 wrote:
>> So it happened .. how do we prevent it in the future? How did it pass testing?
> A first +1 vote 22 hours _before_ it entered the updates-testing repo.
> A second +1 vote eight hours _before_ it entered the updates-testing repo.
> A third +1 vote and automatic push to stable two hours after it had entered
> It has not been offered long enough for more testers to give it a try.
> For example, here it had not been picked up by the nearby mirror yet when
> the karma threshold was reached. By the time it had arrived and the first
> scriptlet errors were noticed and required a closer look to find the culprit,
> the update had been pushed to stable already.
> How to prevent it from happening in the future? The update criteria for
> the so-called critical path packages could be made more strict. A minimum
> time for updates to stay in the updates-testing repo. A higher karma
> threshold probably won't be sufficient, if testers aim at speed instead
> of safety.
Yeah that makes sense. (Automated tests that do test basic stuff would
help as well).
More information about the devel