SELinux RPM scriplet issue annoucement

Daniel J Walsh dwalsh at
Mon Jan 20 17:25:34 UTC 2014

Hash: SHA1

On 01/20/2014 10:50 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 08:42 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:02:24 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>>> Anyone not aware of the problem and the fix, who applies the
>>>> -117.fc20 selinux-policy update in _enforcing_ mode (since it has
>>>> entered stable updates meanwhile) believing it to be a normal update,
>>>> will face another failure and a partial update. Package
>>>> selinux-policy updated to -117.fc20 but -targeted remaining at
>>>> -116.fc20.
>>> I don't see this. I just updated today before reading this message (and
>>> I haven;t read the whole thread, sorry) and I got selinux-policy and
>>> targeted updated without any problem (I always run in enforcing mode).
>> Did you update from -116.fc20 or an earlier one?
>> Only if you come from -116.fc20, you would be affected, since -116.fc20
>> is the bad update.
> Ah I think I skipped 116, sorry for the noise.
> Simo.
Lucky man, hopefully a lot of users skipped it...
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -


More information about the devel mailing list