SELinux RPM scriplet issue annoucement
awilliam at redhat.com
Tue Jan 21 01:00:40 UTC 2014
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 15:35 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:48:28AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I'd suggest this test should be a high priority for implementation once
> > taskotron is operational, perhaps equal in importance to re-implementing
> > the current AutoQA tests.
> *nod* Sounds good to me.
> > what we have. I don't know how to quantify that point, though. All's I
> > can do is reiterate that yes, this is a really significant pain point in
> > our current processes, the proposed Bodhi 2.0 design would make things
> > almost immeasurably better, and plead with anyone reading this who has
> > the power to bump up the importance of / resources assigned to Bodhi
> > 2.0's development to do so.
> So many things at top priority. :) I know Luke Macken is actually actively
> working it.
I know he is. He's been actively working on it for the said three-four
year period. Every FUDCon/Flock he tells me it's nearly done. ;)
Not ragging Luke, but it rather seems like we need about six more of
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
More information about the devel