.spec file Source0 magic for github release source tarballs?
leamas.alec at gmail.com
Tue Jan 21 17:49:19 UTC 2014
You could file a issue at the FPC trac, preferably with a proposal for new
That said, I notice that we use what "works for me", despite any GL so
maybe it doesn't matter. Dunno.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 01/21/2014 12:39 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Alec Leamas <leamas.alec at gmail.com
>> <mailto:leamas.alec at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Actually, the GL are pretty clear here: the source should be
>> referenced using the full commit, nothing else. There is some
>> reasoning why. The tag should got to Version: (as long its 'sane').
>> Besides that this is the existing GL, there is also a subtle
>> difference in git-archive (which supposedly runs this). When
>> archiving a tag, the sources gets today's date. OTOH, when
>> archiving a commit, the sources modification dates are their commit
>> date. Last time I checked this was also true on github.
>> Of course github could change it at any time but it looks to be working
>> properly right now, in the case of OpenColorIO:
> Yes, that's the magick I needed. Works for me in nfs-ganesha.
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel