Fedora.next in 2014 -- Big Picture and Themes

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Thu Jan 23 22:46:33 UTC 2014

Am 23.01.2014 23:37, schrieb drago01:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
>> No, I don't disagree with you there. But the repos don't exist in a
>> vacuum. Right now they are our way of shipping software in Fedora: our
>> *only* way. If you want to install the Fedora-y version of a particular
>> piece of software, you use the repositories. End of story.
> I can do "gem install foo" or "pip install foo" on current (and past)
> fedora releases.
> So no the story does not quite end here ;)

there is a difference if you *want* do so or *forced* to do so
because there is no longer a *single* and consistent package
source what is over years and still *THE* greath strength of
a linux *distribution*

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 246 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140123/cd14e774/attachment.sig>

More information about the devel mailing list