Fedora.next in 2014 -- Big Picture and Themes

[Reindl Harald]

Am 23.01.2014 23:49, schrieb drago01:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>>
>> Am 23.01.2014 23:37, schrieb drago01:
>>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> No, I don't disagree with you there. But the repos don't exist in a
>>>> vacuum. Right now they are our way of shipping software in Fedora: our
>>>> *only* way. If you want to install the Fedora-y version of a particular
>>>> piece of software, you use the repositories. End of story.
>>>
>>> I can do "gem install foo" or "pip install foo" on current (and past)
>>> fedora releases.
>>> So no the story does not quite end here ;)
>>
>> there is a difference if you *want* do so or *forced* to do so
>> because there is no longer a *single* and consistent package
>> source what is over years and still *THE* greath strength of
>> a linux *distribution*
> 
> No one is proposing to force anyone to do anything so stop the FUD please

where in the world do you see FUD?

if a software is packed "the new way" and no longer available in the
classical repos as RPM you are forced to use whatever to install
the package this way instead of a single source like YUM

what about consider the result of changes over the long instead
insinuate someone is spreading FUD with no reason to do so

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 246 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140123/8520d518/attachment.sig>