RFC - Downgrade BlueZ to v4.101 in Fedora 20

Orcan Ogetbil oget.fedora at gmail.com
Fri Jan 24 02:53:51 UTC 2014

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 21:35 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> Right. But is it possible to ship a bluez4 package and rebuild the
>> dependencies against that after the release?
> How does that differ, in practice?


- No epoch bump.
- Packages which really need bluez-5, can continue to use it
- No rebuild needed for packages which do not rely on the missing functionality

That said, I am not sure which of the above would apply to the current
situation. That's why I asked.


More information about the devel mailing list