Drawing lessons from fatal SELinux bug #1054350
awilliam at redhat.com
Fri Jan 24 06:58:58 UTC 2014
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 01:35 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> yeah , so revoke an update could be a better idea.
> How would that work? We don't control the mirrors. Mirrors can choose
> to sync anytime they want to and retain packages we have removed.
Even if we can do it on the mirrors, we have no way to 'recall' a
package from systems where it's already been installed (of course in the
current case that wouldn't have worked anyway, but we're discussing the
generic case here).
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
More information about the devel