RFC - Downgrade BlueZ to v4.101 in Fedora 20

drago01 drago01 at gmail.com
Fri Jan 24 12:20:15 UTC 2014

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 16:56 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
>> > As a side note, it also needs to be discussed how such a key feature of
>> > the bluetooth stack could go unnoticed through QA, and how to avoid this
>> > from happening again.
>> Indeed.  I wondered the same myself.
> I'm somewhat cheered that our product has apparently reached the quality
> level where people consider a Bluetooth audio profile to be a 'key
> feature', but so far as our QA standards are concerned, it ain't.
> This didn't really 'pass unnoticed' through QA. I noticed it, and was
> supremely unconcerned.

We should stop this "its crap anyway" attitude. That's the reason why
people perceive fedora
as beta / unstable / breaks often etc.

Did you at least file a bug?

More information about the devel mailing list