Upgrade ICU to 52.1 with soname bump

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 20:25:04 +0100
Eike Rathke <erack at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> If time permits I'd like to do an upgrade of ICU to 52.1 next week,
> which leads to the usual soname bump.
> 
> As quite a lot of packages are affected by this, is anyone objecting
> and can point out a better time for the upgrade?

Hum... perhaps I am missing something, but I don't see anything that is
directly affected. There's no packages that buildrequire or require icu?
Or am I looking at the wrong package?

I guess you mean libicu?

In that case: 

389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc20.src.rpm
389-adminutil-1.1.19-1.fc21.src.rpm
389-ds-base-1.3.2.10-1.fc21.src.rpm
389-dsgw-1.1.11-1.fc20.src.rpm
boost-1.54.0-10.fc21.src.rpm
brltty-4.5-9.fc21.src.rpm
calibre-1.21.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
calligra-2.7.91-1.fc21.src.rpm
couchdb-1.5.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
dee-1.0.14-2.fc20.src.rpm
dwdiff-2.0.9-1.fc21.src.rpm
evolution-data-server-3.11.4-1.fc21.src.rpm
fcitx-4.2.8.3-1.fc21.src.rpm
firebird-2.5.2.26539.0-9.fc21.src.rpm
fontmatrix-0.9.99-14.r1218.fc21.src.rpm
gdisk-0.8.8-1.fc21.src.rpm
gnustep-base-1.24.4-8.fc20.src.rpm
harfbuzz-0.9.25-1.fc21.src.rpm
ibus-qt-1.3.2-5.fc20.src.rpm
icu-50.1.2-10.fc21.src.rpm
idzebra-2.0.52-5.fc20.src.rpm
libcdr-0.0.14-5.fc21.src.rpm
libcommuni-2.2.0-2.fc21.src.rpm
libe-book-0.0.2-1.fc21.src.rpm
libguestfs-1.25.26-1.fc21.src.rpm
libmspub-0.0.6-4.fc21.src.rpm
libreoffice-4.2.0.3-2.fc21.src.rpm
libtranslit-0.0.3-2.fc21.src.rpm
libvisio-0.0.31-1.fc21.src.rpm
mapnik-2.2.0-5.fc21.src.rpm
msort-8.53-11.fc20.src.rpm
nodejs-node-stringprep-0.1.8-1.fc20.src.rpm
nqp-0.0.2013.09-1.fc21.src.rpm
openttd-1.3.3-1.fc21.src.rpm
open-vm-tools-9.4.0-2.fc21.src.rpm
pam_mapi-0.1.2-4.fc20.src.rpm
parrot-5.5.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
php-5.5.8-2.fc21.src.rpm
php-symfony-icu-1.2.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
pion-net-4.0.9-10.fc21.src.rpm
pyicu-1.5-3.fc20.src.rpm
qt5-qtbase-5.2.0-4.fc21.src.rpm
qt5-qtwebkit-5.2.0-2.fc21.src.rpm
R-3.0.2-3.fc21.src.rpm
rakudo-star-0.0.2013.09_5.5.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
raptor2-2.0.9-2.fc20.src.rpm
rubygem-charlock_holmes-0.6.9.4-3.fc20.src.rpm
sword-1.6.2-11.fc20.src.rpm
texlive-2013-4.20131226_r32488.fc21.src.rpm
tracker-0.17.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
unar-1.8-1.fc21.src.rpm
v8-3.14.5.10-3.fc21.src.rpm
webkitgtk-2.2.4-2.fc21.src.rpm
webkitgtk3-2.3.4-1.fc21.src.rpm
yaz-4.2.56-3.fc20.src.rpm
zarafa-7.1.7-1.fc21.src.rpm
zorba-2.9.1-1.fc20.src.rpm

Are there any changes in the 50->52.1 jump that would need
patches/changes? Or should it just mostly be a rebuild?

Do you have any provenpackager(s) who can help you rebuild things?

> If not, I'll probably announce it on Monday and do the upgrade on
> Wednesday.

Seems fine.

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140125/757d1f2d/attachment.sig>