Snapshotting for rollback after updates was[ Re: Drawing lessons from fatal SELinux bug #1054350]

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Mon Jan 27 00:20:23 UTC 2014



Am 27.01.2014 01:18, schrieb Chris Murphy:
> On Jan 26, 2014, at 4:55 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>> Am 27.01.2014 00:51, schrieb Chris Murphy:
>>> On Jan 26, 2014, at 4:29 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> do yourself and everybody a favour and
>>>>
>>>> * don't claim others are rude while you talk like above and worser half of the thread
>>>> * don't talk about things above your technical scope
>>>> * discuss with software engineers while lacking basic understanding of the topic
>>>>
>>>> posts like yours in that thread belongs to the users list and *not* to a development list
>>>
>>> Request declined.
>>>
>>> You are the only person who has suggested a method of rollbacks that fundamentally would not work
>>
>> are you drunken?
> 
> I haven't had anything to drink in 24+ hours, but this seems off topic.
>>
>> i have *not* requested any method of rollback
> 
> You gave several examples of rollback-snapshot methods - same thing as you suggested them. I never said you requested them

oh my god - i gave several examples *what could be dangerous* in doing that
i *never* ever suggested them
please re-read the thread and then come back with an excuse

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 246 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140127/494563e3/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list