Fedora.next in 2014 -- Big Picture and Themes

Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com
Tue Jan 28 17:44:34 UTC 2014


On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 17:40 +0000, "J├│hann B. Gu├░mundsson" wrote:
> On 01/28/2014 05:33 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > And that's reasonable. But as we have defined Fedora server as "not anything
> > in particular", that drifts closer and closer to "not a thing". That leaves
> > define release criteria -- let alone blockers.
> >
> 
> Why do you think we in QA are going to be defining release criteria 
> surrounding cloud workstation or server?

Matthew's sentence does not parse grammatically at all, which makes it
hard for me to figure out what I'm saying, but he didn't mention 'QA' at
all.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net



More information about the devel mailing list