Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins
sgallagh at redhat.com
Wed Jan 29 21:03:08 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 01/29/2014 03:57 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
> I think we should keep spins as long as we don't have a formal
> process to accept new products. Something like => proposal => crop
> (aka product-to-be) => validation => product When we'll have that,
> drop the whole spin thing, any spin that isn't fit to be a product
> should be reclassified as remix.
> btw, it wouldn't be wise to define that process while we're still
> in Fedora.Next early stages, it'll just had more entropy. First we
> should work to release our sample products, then use that
> experience to define the process to bring a new product.
Well, one of the things we need to decide is whether we address Spins
at all during the F21 timeframe. I suspect that QA will ask for a
reprieve on that score.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the devel