Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins
rc040203 at freenet.de
Thu Jan 30 18:15:09 UTC 2014
On 01/30/2014 05:06 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> That being said, as we go forward as Fedora.NEXT, we start to see more
> clearly defined divisions between Products, Spins and Remixes. Since
> these discussions needed to happen, we (FESCo) felt it was best to try
> to move the conversation public.
> Part of the problem I have with this discussion other than the alarmist
> subject is that we are discussing the "fate of spins" before even coming
> out with concrete products out of the fedora.next proposals. That seems
Until now, I am still unable to grasp the sense of "Fedora.NEXT".
All in all, to me all I've read so far sounds like being a lot of effort
with undefined, unclear or questionable outcome.
More information about the devel