Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 01/30/2014 05:06 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
>     That being said, as we go forward as Fedora.NEXT, we start to see more
>     clearly defined divisions between Products, Spins and Remixes. Since
>     these discussions needed to happen, we (FESCo) felt it was best to try
>     to move the conversation public.
>
>
> Part of the problem I have with this discussion other than the alarmist
> subject is that we are discussing the "fate of spins" before even coming
> out with concrete products out of the fedora.next proposals.  That seems
> premature.

+1

Until now, I am still unable to grasp the sense of "Fedora.NEXT".
All in all, to me all I've read so far sounds like being a lot of effort 
with undefined, unclear or questionable outcome.

Ralf