libgcrypt soname bump in rawhide

[Matthew Garrett]

On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 01:20:26AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> > Maintaining software in general is a burden, but we do it for the
> > benefit of our users anyway. The best case scenario would certainly be
> > for Google to update their packages, but if they don't then how does
> > rendering the package uninstallable benefit our users who want to
> > install it?
> 
> I don't think they "don't" if you could give google-chrome-unstable a try.

I don't follow. My understanding was that all the Chrome builds were 
generic RPMs rather than tracking a specific branch of Fedora, so how 
does the rate of development releases do anything to help us get them to 
update their packages to build against a more recent gcrypt?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org