Call for testers for FMN

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 18.7.2014 13:47, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:59:12PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 17.7.2014 16:22, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
>>
>> Why is the filter called filter? Isn't filter supposed to remove something?
>> These filter seems to cause that email is sent, so that is probably not
>> appropriate name IMO.
> I'm confused, filters should not be named filters?
> FMN is based on fedmsg, which carries hundred of thousands of messages on a
> daily basis and unless you explicitely ask, FMN won't be sending to your inbox
> every single one of them.
> Sounds to me like filter is the appropriate word here.

It is not IMO. If FNM were sending every message to the email, then I 
could use Filter to opt-out from some of them. But for opt-in, it should 
not be called filter.

>> Also, now I noticed that my FAS registration email is used as primary email.
>> Why the fedoraproject alias is not used preferably? May be that is how the
>> OpenID works now, but may be it should be changed there?
> FedOAuth has been modified to use your fedoraproject alias if you have one.
> I don't know if FMN is handling this change though, feel free to open a ticket
> to ask about it.
>
>> Also, how the integration will work with FMN in the future? Will the
>> notifications be automatically enabled, when new maintainer is added to
>> package for example? So you will modify settings of my profile? This should
>> be probably somehow explicitly handled ...
> Are you writing filters for every package you maintain? Or are you using the
> filter `every packages I am involved with`?
>
> Personnaly I use the later, so there is nothing to configure for me when I gain
> ACLs on a package.

I don't use any filters yet (I guess), but that explains a lot ;) Thanks.


Vít