[ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21
ajax at redhat.com
Mon Jun 2 14:05:22 UTC 2014
On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 10:33 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> Is the mga450 supported? Aside from formal graphics test days, I can
> run whatever tests required on x86 (both 32-bit and 64-bit).
Define "supported". I believe for PowerPC in RHEL we build the matroxfb
driver for this card, so that plus the fbdev driver for X is what you
get there. I'm not sure what would happen on Fedora for that, probably
aligning it with RHEL makes sense. On x86 you'd get vesa.
But in any of those cases there's no acceleration code involved, so
"supported" could reaally only mean "lights up and sets modes".
> I've also got a GXT120 (OEM'd MY220P) and the identical x86 card. I'm
> not sure if that would be covered by "mgag200", but again, I can
> provide validation.
The mgag200 driver is, at the moment, only a driver for server variants
of the G200 (G200SE, G200WB, etc). Actual G200, as well as G400 G450
and G550, are not driven by the mgag200 driver at this time.
More information about the devel