Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)
mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
Tue Jun 10 17:21:00 UTC 2014
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:14:03PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:00:05PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > ExcludeArch implies that it's acceptable that it doesn't build on ARM
> > and removes the incentive for anyone to fix it. It's not.
> There's a process for handling this, which is to create (if required)
> a Fedora bug for the package, and then attach it to this tracker:
> Then add ExcludeArch to the package, mentioning the particular bug.
I've never seen this actually result in the bug being fixed in leaf
> I'm going to go ahead and do this now, since otherwise we won't have
> hfsplus-tools at all for any user.
This is inappropriate. The bug is in LLVM, not hfsplus-tools. Quoting
from the guidelines:
"ExcludeArch should only be set when the architecture is not relevant
for the package, the package is non-functional on the architecture, or
the code does not compile cleanly for the architecture."
The code compiles fine, LLVM then fucks up linking.
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
More information about the devel